{"id":10441,"date":"2025-08-12T12:27:33","date_gmt":"2025-08-12T11:27:33","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.klickongstworld.com\/blog\/?p=10441"},"modified":"2025-08-12T12:30:34","modified_gmt":"2025-08-12T11:30:34","slug":"handling-of-inadvertently-rejected-records-on-ims","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.klickongstworld.com\/blog\/handling-of-inadvertently-rejected-records-on-ims\/","title":{"rendered":"Handling of Inadvertently Rejected records on IMS"},"content":{"rendered":"<p align=\"justify\">GSTN  has issued an advisory dated Jun 19th, 2025 for Handling of Inadvertently  Rejected records on IMS.\n    <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"><strong>Question  1: How can a recipient avail ITC of wrongly rejected Invoices\/ Debit  notes\/ECO-Documents in IMS as corresponding GSTR-3B of same tax period was also  filed by recipient?<\/strong> \n    <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"><strong>Answer:<\/strong>&nbsp;In  such cases recipient can request to the corresponding supplier to report the  same record (without any change) in same return period&#8217;s GSTR-1A or respective  amendment table of subsequent GSTR-1\/IFF. Thus, recipient can avail the ITC  basis on amended record by accepting such record on IMS and recomputing GSTR-2B  on IMS. Here the recipient will get ITC of complete amended value as original  record was rejected by the recipient.<br \/>\n  However,  recipient will be able to take ITC for the again furnished document by the  supplier, as stated above, only in the GSTR-2B of the concerned tax-period.\n  <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"><strong>Question  2: If any original record is rejected by the recipient and supplier furnishes  the same record in GSTR-1A of same tax period or in the amendment table of  GSTR-1\/IFF of subsequent period, till the specified time limit, then what  impact it will have on supplier&#8217;s liability?<\/strong> \n  <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"><strong>Answer:<\/strong>&nbsp;In  case supplier had furnished an original record in GSTR-1\/IFF but the same  record was rejected wrongly by the recipient in IMS. In such cases supplier on  noticing the same in the supplier&#8217;s view of IMS dashboard or on request of  recipient, may furnish the same record again (without any change) in GSTR-1A of  same tax period or in the amendment table of GSTR-1\/IFF in any subsequent  period, till the specified time limit, then the liability of supplier will not  increase. As amendment table take delta value only. Thus, in present case of  same values, differential liability increase will be zero.\n  <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"><strong>Question  3: As a recipient taxpayer, how to reverse ITC of wrongly rejected Credit note  in IMS as the corresponding GSTR-3B has already been filed?<\/strong> \n  <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"><strong>Answer:<\/strong>&nbsp;In  such cases recipient can request the concerned supplier to furnish the same  Credit note (CN) without any change in the same return period&#8217;s GSTR-1A or in  amendment table of subsequent period&#8217;s GSTR-1\/IFF. Now recipient can reverse  the availed ITC based on the amended CN by accepting the CN on IMS. Hence, the  recipient&#8217;s ITC will get reduced with complete amended value, as soon as the  recipient recomputes GSTR-2B on IMS. The reduced value is same as that of the  value of original CN as in this case the complete original CN was rejected by  the recipient.\n  <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"><strong>Question  4: If any original Credit note was rejected by the recipient and supplier  furnishes the same credit note in GSTR-1A of same tax period or in the  amendment table of GSTR-1\/IFF of any future tax-period, till the specified time  limit, then what impact it will have on supplier&#8217;s liability?<\/strong> \n  <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"><strong>Answer:<\/strong>&nbsp;At  first instant the supplier&#8217;s liability will be added back in the open GSTR-3B  return, because of original credit note rejection by the recipient. However, as  the supplier furnishes the same credit note in GSTR-1A of same tax period or in  amendment table of GSTR-1\/IFF in any subsequent period, supplier&#8217;s liability  for this amendment will get reduced again corresponding to the value of amended  CN (which in this case is same as original). Thus, net effect on liability of  supplier will be only once.<\/p>\n<div align=\"justify\"><br clear=\"all\">\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>2025\/08\/12-08-08.png<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":10442,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.klickongstworld.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10441"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.klickongstworld.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.klickongstworld.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.klickongstworld.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.klickongstworld.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10441"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.klickongstworld.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10441\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10444,"href":"https:\/\/www.klickongstworld.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10441\/revisions\/10444"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.klickongstworld.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/10442"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.klickongstworld.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10441"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.klickongstworld.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10441"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.klickongstworld.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10441"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}