{"id":525,"date":"2022-02-04T05:21:20","date_gmt":"2022-02-04T05:21:20","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.gstworld.co.in\/blog\/?p=525"},"modified":"2022-06-12T04:09:31","modified_gmt":"2022-06-12T03:09:31","slug":"bombay-hc-sets-aside-rejection-of-gst-refunds-claimed-by-colgate-global-as-providing-reasons-is-mandatory-under-rule-923-under-the-central-gst-act","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.klickongstworld.com\/blog\/bombay-hc-sets-aside-rejection-of-gst-refunds-claimed-by-colgate-global-as-providing-reasons-is-mandatory-under-rule-923-under-the-central-gst-act\/","title":{"rendered":"Bombay HC sets aside rejection of GST refunds claimed by Colgate Global as providing reasons is mandatory under Rule 92(3) under the Central GST Act."},"content":{"rendered":"<p align=\"justify\">The Hon&#8217;ble Bombay High Court in&nbsp;<em>M\/S <\/em>Colgate Global Business Services<em> vs. Union of India &amp; Ors. [<\/em>WRIT PETITION NO. 802 OF  2021<em>]<\/em>&nbsp;has set aside the Order  rejecting GST Refund as no reason was stated by the deputy commissioner of  state tax. The  Hon&#8217;ble Court said that respondent has rejected the application for refund  without recording any reasons, though the same is mandatory under Rule 92(3) of  the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017. The Order passed by the  Respondent is in breach of the said provisions and deserves to be granted and  set aside.<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"><strong>1. Petitioner : <\/strong>Colgate Global Business Services Pvt.  Ltd.<strong><\/strong><\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"><strong>2. Respondents : 1. <\/strong>The Union Of India ]  Through the Ministry of Finance, ] Department of Revenue, ] having its Office  at Udyog Bhavan,] New Delhi &#8211; 110 011.] <br \/>\n  2. Commissioner of State Tax ] GST Bhavan, New Building,  Mazgaon ] Mumbai &#8211; 400 010. ] <br \/>\n  3. Deputy Commissioner of State Tax ] MUM-VAT-E-103,  Mumbai Nodal ] Division 12, 2nd Floor ] GST Bhavan, New Building, Mazgaon ]  Mumbai &#8211; 400 010.<br \/>\n  <strong><\/strong><br \/>\n  <strong>3. Appeal Type\/ No. : <\/strong>WRIT PETITION NO. 802 OF 2021<strong> <\/strong><\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"><strong>4. CORAM : <\/strong>1. HON&#8217;BLE MR. JUSTICE R.  D. DHANUKA,<br \/>\n2. HON&#8217;BLE MR. JUSTICE S. M. MODAK,  JJ.<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"><strong>5. Council For Petitioners<\/strong> : Mr.Jitendra Motwani a\/w. Ms.Rinky Jassuja i\/b. M\/s.  Economic Laws Practice<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"><strong>6. Council For Respondents<\/strong> : Mr.Jitendra B. Mishra a\/w. Ms.Sangeeta Yadav for  Respondent No.1. ,<br \/>\n  Ms.Jyoti Chavan, A.G.P. for Respondent  Nos.2 &amp; 3.<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"><strong>7. Date of pronouncement<\/strong> :  JANUARY 25, 2022 <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"><strong>8. Facts:<\/strong> <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">Colgate Global Business  Services Pvt. Ltd. (<strong>&quot;the  Petitioner&quot;<\/strong>) has filed the pitition under  Article 226 of the Constitution of India and challenged the Order dated 15th June  2020 (<strong>&quot;Impugned  order&quot;<\/strong>) passed  by Deputy Commissioner of State Tax (the Respondent No.3) thereby rejecting the  application for refund made by the Petitioner. <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"><strong>The Petitioner<\/strong> has challenged  the said impugned Order mainly on the ground that the Respondent No.3 was bound  to record reasons in the Order while rejecting the application for refund in  view of Rule 92(3) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017.<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">A Perusal of the impugned  Order indicates that the Respondent No.3 has rejected the application for  refund without recording any reasons, though the same is mandatory under Rule  92(3) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017. <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">The Hon&#8217;ble Bombay High Court viewed that the Order  passed by the Respondent No.3 is in breach of the said provisions and deserves  to be granted and set aside.<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">Ms.Chavan, learned A.G.P.  for Respondent Nos.2 &amp; 3, on instructions, stated that the Respondent No.3  would pass a fresh Order in compliance with Rule 92(3) of the Central Goods and  Services Tax Rules, 2017 after rendering an opportunity to the Petitioner of  being heard expeditiously. <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">The division  bench of Justice S.M.Modak and Justice R.D.Dhanuka accepted the statement. <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"><strong>9. Nature of Issue : <\/strong><strong>Order sanctioning refund<\/strong><strong>, Order under Rule 92(3) under the  Central&nbsp;GST&nbsp;Act.<u><\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"><strong>Providing reasons is mandatory to pass the  order under Rule 92(3) under the Central&nbsp;GST&nbsp;Act.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"><strong>10. Industry : Not industry specific<\/strong> <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"><strong>11. Held:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">The division  bench of Justice S.M.Modak and Justice R.D.Dhanuka held on January 25, 2022 that Impugned Order dated 15th  June 2020 passed by the Respondent No.3 is quashed and set-aside. The application  for refund made by the Petitioner for the period July 2017 to March 2018 for  the sum of Rs.4,33,03,066\/- is restored to file before the Respondent No.3. <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">The Petitioner is directed  to remain present before the Respondent No.3 for personal hearing on 2nd  February 2022 at 11.00 am. <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">The court  directed the Respondent No.3 to pass a fresh Order without  being influenced by the observations made and the conclusions drawn in the  impugned Order dated 15th June 2020 and in accordance with law expeditiously  and not later than three weeks from the date of granting personal hearing to  the Petitioner. <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">The court  further ordered that the  Order that would be passed by the Respondent No.3 shall be conveyed to the  Petitioner within one week from the date of passing of the said Order. If  refund application is allowed, the Respondent No.3 shall refund the amount due  to the Petitioner within two weeks from the date of passing of such Order. If  the Order is adverse against the Petitioner, the Petitioner would be at liberty  to file appropriate proceedings.<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"><strong>12. In favour of :<\/strong> Petitioner <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"><strong>13. Case Law Refereces &#8211; <\/strong> <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"><strong>14. Relevant Act\/ Rules\/ Forms : <\/strong>Rule 92(3) of the CGST Rules, 2017<strong><u> <\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">Rule 92(3) of the Central Goods and  Services Tax Rules, 2017, read as &#8211; &#8220;(3) Where the proper officer is satisfied,  for reasons to be recorded in writing, that the whole or any part of the amount  claimed as refund is not admissible or is not payable to the applicant, he  shall issue a notice in <strong>FORM GST RFD-08 <\/strong>to the applicant, requiring him  to furnish a reply in <strong>FORM GST RFD-09 <\/strong>within a period of fifteen days of  the receipt of such notice and after considering the reply, make an order in <strong>FORM  GST RFD-06 <\/strong>sanctioning the amount of refund in whole or part, or rejecting  the said refund claim and the said order shall be made available to the  applicant electronically and the provisions of sub-rule (1) shall, mutatis mutandis, apply to the extent  refund is allowed: <br \/>\n    <strong>Provided<\/strong> that no  application for refund shall be rejected without giving the applicant an  opportunity of being heard.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><strong>15.  Database Citation<\/strong> : <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/klickongstworld.com\/uploads\/CGST\/instructions\/1643952870.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HC-GW-19-2022-MH<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>2022\/02\/Bombay-High-Court-DH-2-152468371-1588593985.jpg<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":526,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.klickongstworld.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/525"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.klickongstworld.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.klickongstworld.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.klickongstworld.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.klickongstworld.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=525"}],"version-history":[{"count":10,"href":"https:\/\/www.klickongstworld.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/525\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7433,"href":"https:\/\/www.klickongstworld.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/525\/revisions\/7433"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.klickongstworld.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/526"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.klickongstworld.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=525"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.klickongstworld.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=525"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.klickongstworld.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=525"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}