{"id":7779,"date":"2022-07-07T05:28:15","date_gmt":"2022-07-07T04:28:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.klickongstworld.com\/blog\/?p=7779"},"modified":"2022-07-07T05:28:50","modified_gmt":"2022-07-07T04:28:50","slug":"cbic-issued-clarification-on-issue-of-claiming-refund-under-inverted-duty-structure-where-the-supplier-is-supplying-goods-under-some-concessional-notification","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.klickongstworld.com\/blog\/cbic-issued-clarification-on-issue-of-claiming-refund-under-inverted-duty-structure-where-the-supplier-is-supplying-goods-under-some-concessional-notification\/","title":{"rendered":"CBIC issued Clarification on issue of claiming refund under inverted duty structure where the supplier is supplying goods under some concessional notification"},"content":{"rendered":"<p align=\"justify\">The CBIC has issued <strong>Circular No. 173\/05\/2022-GST<\/strong> <strong>dated July 06, 2022<\/strong>&nbsp;wherein it has Clarified on issue of claiming refund under inverted  duty structure where  the supplier is supplying  goods under some concessional notification.<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">Various representations have been received  seeking clarification with regard to applicability of para 3.2 of the Circular No. 135\/05\/2020-GST dated 31.03.2020 in cases where  the supplier is required to supply goods  at a lower rate under  Concessional Notification issued  by the Government. In order  to clarify the issue and to ensure uniformity in the implementation of the provisions of law in this regard across the field  formations, the Board, in exercise of its powers  conferred by section 168 (1) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as &#8220;CGST Act&#8221;), hereby clarifies the issue  as under:<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">Vide para 3.2  of Circular No. 135\/05\/2020-GST dated 31.03.2020, it was clarified that refund on account of inverted duty  structure would not be admissible in cases where the input and output supply are same. Para 3.2 of  Circular No. 135\/05\/2020-GST dated 31.03.2020 is reproduced, as under:<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"><em>&#8220;Refund  of accumulated ITC in terms clause (ii) of sub-section (3) of section 54 of the  CGST Act is available where the  credit has accumulated on account of rate of tax on inputs being higher  than the rate of  tax on output supplies. It is noteworthy that, the input and output  being the same in such cases, though  attracting different tax rates at different points in time, do not get covered under the provisions of clause (ii) of sub-section (3) of section  54 of the CGST Act. <strong>It is hereby clarified that refund of  accumulated ITC under clause (ii) of sub-section (3) of section 54 of the CGST Act would not be applicable  in cases where the input and the output supplies  are the same.&#8221;<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">The  matter has been examined. The intent of para 3.2 of Circular  No. 135\/05\/2020-GST dated 31.03.2020 was not to cover those  cases where the supplier is making supply of goods under a concessional notification and the rate of tax of output supply is less than the rate of tax  on input supply (of the same goods) at the same point of time due to supply of goods by the supplier under such concessional  notification.<br \/>\n  Therefore, it  is clarified that in such cases, refund of accumulated input tax credit on account of inverted structure as per  clause (ii) of sub-section (3) of section 54 of the CGST Act, 2017 would be allowed in cases where accumulation of input  tax credit is on account of rate of tax on outward supply  being less than the rate of tax on inputs  (same goods) at the same  point of time, as per some concessional notification issued by the  Government providing for lower rate of tax for some specified supplies  subject to fulfilment of other conditions. <strong>Accordingly, para 3.2  of the Circular No. 135\/05\/2020-GST dated 31.03.2020 stands substituted as under<\/strong>:<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"><em>&#8220;3.2 It may be noted that refund of accumulated  ITC in terms of clause (ii) of first proviso  to sub-section (3) of section 54 of the CGST Act is available where the credit has accumulated on account of rate of tax  on inputs being higher than the rate of tax on  output supplies. It is noteworthy that, the input and output being the same in  such cases, though attracting different tax rates at different points  in time, do not get covered under  the provisions of clause (ii) of the first proviso  to sub-section (3) of section  54 of the CGST Act.<\/em><\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"><em>3.3 There may however, be cases where  though inputs and output goods are same but  the output supplies are made under a concessional notification due to which the rate of tax on output  supplies is less than the rate of tax on inputs. In such cases,  as the rate of tax of output supply is less than the rate of tax on  inputs at the same point of time due  to supply of goods by the supplier under such concessional notification, the credit accumulated on account of the same is admissible for refund under the provisions of clause (ii) of the first proviso  to sub-section (3) of section  54 of the CGST Act, other than the cases where output supply is  either Nil rated or fully exempted, and also  provided that supply of such goods or services are not notified by the  Government for their exclusion from refund of accumulated ITC under the said  clause.&#8221;<\/em><strong>&nbsp;<\/strong><\/p>\n<p align=\"center\"><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.klickongstworld.com\/uploads\/CGST\/1657124679.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Klick here for the copy of the Circular<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>2022\/06\/cbic-logo-new-1.jpg<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":7535,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.klickongstworld.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7779"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.klickongstworld.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.klickongstworld.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.klickongstworld.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.klickongstworld.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7779"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.klickongstworld.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7779\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7782,"href":"https:\/\/www.klickongstworld.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7779\/revisions\/7782"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.klickongstworld.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/7535"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.klickongstworld.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7779"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.klickongstworld.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7779"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.klickongstworld.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7779"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}