{"id":8503,"date":"2022-12-28T04:49:05","date_gmt":"2022-12-28T04:49:05","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.klickongstworld.com\/blog\/?p=8503"},"modified":"2022-12-28T04:50:27","modified_gmt":"2022-12-28T04:50:27","slug":"difference-in-itc-availed-in-form-gstr-3b-and-gstr-2a-for-fy-2017-18-and-2018-19-cbic-clarifies-procedure","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.klickongstworld.com\/blog\/difference-in-itc-availed-in-form-gstr-3b-and-gstr-2a-for-fy-2017-18-and-2018-19-cbic-clarifies-procedure\/","title":{"rendered":"Difference in ITC availed in FORM GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A for FY 2017-18 and 2018-19: CBIC Clarifies Procedure"},"content":{"rendered":"<p align=\"justify\">The Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs  has clarified the procedure to deal with difference in  Input Tax Credit (ITC) availed in FORM GSTR-3B as compared to that detailed in  FORM GSTR-2A for FY 2017-18 and 2018-19.\n  <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">Section  16 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as  &#8220;CGST Act&#8221;) provides for eligibility and conditions for availing Input Tax  Credit (ITC). During the initial period of implementation of GST, during the  financial years 2017-18 and 2018-19, in many cases, the suppliers have failed  to furnish the correct details of outward supplies in their FORM GSTR-1, which  has led to certain deficiencies or discrepancies in FORM GSTR-2A of their  recipients. However, the concerned recipients may have availed input tax credit  on the said supplies in their returns in FORM GSTR-3B. The discrepancies  between the amount of ITC availed by the registered persons in their returns in  FORM GSTR3B and the amount as available in their FORM GSTR-2A are being noticed  by the tax officers during proceedings such as scrutiny\/ audit\/ investigation  etc. due to such credit not flowing to FORM GSTR-2A of the said registered  persons. Such discrepancies are considered by the tax officers as representing  ineligible ITC availed by the registered persons, and are being flagged seeking  explanation from the registered persons for such discrepancies and\/or for  reversal of such ineligible ITC. \n  <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">It  is mentioned that FORM GSTR-2A could not be made available to the taxpayers on  the common portal during the initial stages of implementation of GST. Further,  restrictions regarding availment of ITC by the registered persons upto certain  specified limit beyond the ITC available as per FORM GSTR-2A were provided  under rule 36(4) of Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 (hereinafter  referred to as &#8220;CGST Rules&#8221;) only with effect from 9th October 2019. However,  the availability of ITC was subjected to restrictions and conditions specified  in Section 16 of CGST Act from 1st July, 2017 itself. In view of this, various  representations have been received from the trade as well as the tax  authorities, seeking clarification regarding the manner of dealing with such  discrepancies between the amount of ITC availed by the registered persons in  their FORM GSTR-3B and the amount as available in their FORM GSTR-2A during FY  2017-18 and FY 2018-19. \n  <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">As per the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.klickongstworld.com\/uploads\/CGST\/Circular\/1672149713.pdf\">Circular No. 183\/15\/2022-GST issued on 27th  December, 2022<\/a>, in cases Where  the supplier has failed to file FORM GSTR-1 for a tax period but has filed the  return in FORM GSTR-3B for said tax period, due to which the supplies made in  the said tax period do not get reflected in FORM GSTR-2A of the recipients. In  such cases, the difference in ITC claimed by the registered person in his  return in FORM GSTR-3B and that available in FORM GSTR-2A may be handled by  following the procedure as prescribed. \n  <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">Further, Where  the supplier has filed FORM GSTR-1 as well as return in FORM GSTR-3B for a tax  period, but has failed to report a particular supply in FORM GSTR-1, due to  which the said supply does not get reflected in FORM GSTR-2A of the recipient.  In such cases, the difference in ITC claimed by the registered person in his  return in FORM GSTR-3B and that available in FORM GSTR-2A may be handled by  following the procedure as prescribed. \n  <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">Further, Where  supplies were made to a registered person and invoice is issued as per Rule 46  of CGST Rules containing GSTIN of the recipient, but supplier has wrongly  reported the said supply as B2C supply, instead of B2B supply, in his FORM  GSTR-1, due to which the said supply does not get reflected in FORM GSTR-2A of  the said registered person. In such cases, the difference in ITC claimed by the  registered person in his return in FORM GSTR-3B and that available in FORM  GSTR-2A may be handled by following the procedure as prescribed. \n  <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">Further, Where  the supplier has filed FORM GSTR-1 as well as return in FORM GSTR-3B for a tax  period, but he has declared the supply with wrong GSTIN of the recipient in  FORM GSTR-1. In such cases, the difference in ITC claimed by the registered  person in his return in FORM GSTR-3B and that available in FORM GSTR-2A may be  handled by following the procedure as prescribed. \n  <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">In addition,  the proper officer of the actual recipient shall intimate the concerned  jurisdictional tax authority of the registered person, whose GSTIN has been  mentioned wrongly, that ITC on those transactions is required to be disallowed,  if claimed by such recipients in their FORM GSTR-3B. However, allowance of ITC  to the actual recipient shall not depend on the completion of the action by the  tax authority of such registered person, whose GSTIN has been mentioned  wrongly, and such action will be pursued as an independent action.\n  <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"><strong><u>Procedure  to follow<\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">  The  proper officer shall first seek the details from the registered person  regarding all the invoices on which ITC has been availed by the registered  person in his FORM GSTR 3B but which are not reflecting in his FORM GSTR 2A. He  shall then ascertain fulfillment of the following conditions of Section 16 of  CGST Act in respect of the input tax credit availed on such invoices by the  said registered person:\n  <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">i)  that he is in possession of a tax invoice or debit note issued by the supplier  or such other tax paying documents; \n  <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">ii)  that he has received the goods or services or both; \n  <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">iii)  that he has made payment for the amount towards the value of supply, along with  tax payable thereon, to the supplier.\n  <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">Besides,  the proper officer shall also check whether any reversal of input tax credit is  required to be made in accordance with section 17 or section 18 of CGST Act and  also whether the said input tax credit has been availed within the time period  specified under sub-section (4) of section 16 of CGST Act.\n  <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">In  order to verify the condition of clause (c) of sub-section (2) of Section 16 of  CGST Act that tax on the said supply has been paid by the supplier, the  following action may be taken by the proper officer:\n  <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">In  case, where difference between the ITC claimed in FORM GSTR-3B and that  available in FORM GSTR 2A of the registered person in respect of a supplier for  the said financial year exceeds Rs 5 lakh, the proper officer shall ask the  registered person to produce a certificate for the concerned supplier from the  Chartered Accountant (CA) or the Cost Accountant (CMA), certifying that  supplies in respect of the said invoices of supplier have actually been made by  the supplier to the said registered person and the tax on such supplies has  been paid by the said supplier in his return in FORM GSTR 3B. Certificate  issued by CA or CMA shall contain UDIN. UDIN of the certificate issued by CAs  can be verified from ICAI website https:\/\/udin.icai.org\/search-udin and that  issued by CMAs can be verified from ICMAI website  https:\/\/eicmai.in\/udin\/VerifyUDIN.aspx.\n  <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">In  cases, where difference between the ITC claimed in FORM GSTR-3B and that  available in FORM GSTR 2A of the registered person in respect of a supplier for  the said financial year is upto Rs 5 lakh, the proper officer shall ask the  claimant to produce a certificate from the concerned supplier to the effect  that said supplies have actually been made by him to the said registered person  and the tax on said supplies has been paid by the said supplier in his return  in FORM GSTR 3B.\n  <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">However,  it may be noted that for the period FY 2017-18, as per proviso to section 16(4)  of CGST Act, the aforesaid relaxations shall not be applicable to the claim of  ITC made in the FORM GSTR-3B return filed after the due date of furnishing  return for the month of September, 2018 till the due date of furnishing return  for March, 2019, if supplier had not furnished details of the said supply in  his FORM GSTR-1 till the due date of furnishing FORM GSTR 1 for the month of  March, 2019. \n  <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">It  may also be noted that the clarifications given hereunder are case specific and  are applicable to the bonafide errors committed in reporting during FY 2017-18  and 2018- 19. Further, these guidelines are clarificatory in nature and may be  applied as per the actual facts and circumstances of each case and shall not be  used in the interpretation of the provisions of law.\n  <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">These  instructions will apply only to the ongoing proceedings in scrutiny\/audit\/  investigation, etc. for FY 2017-18 and 2018-19 and not to the completed  proceedings. However, these instructions will apply in those cases for FY  2017-18 and 2018-19 where any adjudication or appeal proceedings are still  pending.<\/p>\n<p align=\"center\"><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.klickongstworld.com\/uploads\/CGST\/Circular\/1672149713.pdf\">Klick here for the copy of the Circular<\/a><\/strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.klickongstworld.com\/uploads\/CGST\/Circular\/1672149713.pdf\"> <\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>2022\/06\/cbic-logo-new-1.jpg<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":7535,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.klickongstworld.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8503"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.klickongstworld.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.klickongstworld.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.klickongstworld.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.klickongstworld.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8503"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.klickongstworld.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8503\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":8506,"href":"https:\/\/www.klickongstworld.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8503\/revisions\/8506"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.klickongstworld.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/7535"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.klickongstworld.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8503"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.klickongstworld.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8503"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.klickongstworld.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8503"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}