{"id":9611,"date":"2023-12-14T05:37:20","date_gmt":"2023-12-14T05:37:20","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.klickongstworld.com\/blog\/?p=9611"},"modified":"2023-12-14T05:48:31","modified_gmt":"2023-12-14T05:48:31","slug":"cbic-issues-important-instructions-aligning-with-supreme-court-ruling-northern-operating-systems-pvt-ltd-on-secondment-of-overseas-employees-in-indian-firms","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.klickongstworld.com\/blog\/cbic-issues-important-instructions-aligning-with-supreme-court-ruling-northern-operating-systems-pvt-ltd-on-secondment-of-overseas-employees-in-indian-firms\/","title":{"rendered":"CBIC Issues Instructions for the applicability of the principles laid down by the Hon&#8217;ble Supreme Court&#8217;s judgment on the issue of nature of secondment of employees by overseas entities to Indian firms under GST"},"content":{"rendered":"<p align=\"justify\">The Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) has issued&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.klickongstworld.com\/uploads\/SGST\/TaxNotification\/1702488745.pdf\">Instruction No. 05\/2023-GST  dated December 13, 2023<\/a>, for the applicability of the principles  laid down by the Hon&#8217;ble Supreme Court&#8217;s judgment in Northern Operating  Systems Private Limited (NOS) caseon the issue of nature of  secondment of employees by overseas entities to Indian firms underGST.<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">Attention is invited to the Hon&#8217;ble Supreme Court&#8217;s judgment dated  May 19, 2022 in the case of&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/main.sci.gov.in\/supremecourt\/2021\/14156\/14156_2021_2_1501_36077_Judgement_19-May-2022.pdf\">CC, CE &amp; ST, Bangalore  (Adj.) etc. Vs. Northern Operating Systems Private Limited (NOS) in Civil  Appeal No. 2289-2293 of 2021<\/a>&nbsp;on the issue of nature of  secondment of employees by overseas entities to Indian firms and its Service  Tax implications. Representations have been received in the Board that,  subsequent to the aforesaid judgment, many field formations have initiated  proceedings for the alleged evasion of GST on the issue of secondment under  section 74(1) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter  referred to as the &#8216;CGST Act&#8217;).<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">The matter has been examined by the Board. It appears that the  Hon&#8217;ble Supreme Court in its judgment inter-alia took note of the various facts  of the case like the agreement between Northern Operating  Systems Private Limited (NOS) and overseas group companies,  and held that the secondment of employees by the overseas group company to NOS  was a taxable service of &#8216;manpower supply&#8217; and Service Tax was applicable on  the same. It is noted that secondment as a practice is not restricted to  Service Tax and issue of taxability on secondment shall arise in GST also. A  careful reading of the Northern Operating Systems Private Limited (NOS) judgment indicates that Hon&#8217;ble Supreme Court&#8217;s emphasis is on a  nuanced examination based on the unique characteristics of each specific  arrangement, rather than relying on any singular test.<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">Hon&#8217;ble Supreme Court in the case of Commissioner of Central  Excise, Mumbai Versus M\/s Fiat India(P) Ltd in Civil Appeal 1648-49 of 2004 has  given the following observation-<br \/>\n    <em>&#8221; 66. Each case depends on  its own facts and a close similarity between one case and another is not enough  because either a single significant detail may alter the entire aspect. In  deciding such cases, one should avoid the temptation to decide cases (as said  by Cardozo) by matching the colour of one case against the colour of another.  To decide, therefore, on which side of the line a case falls, the broad  resemblance to another case is not at all decisive.&#8221;<\/em><\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">It may be relevant to note that there may be multiple types of  arrangements in relation to secondment of employees of overseas group company  in the Indian entity. In each arrangement, the tax implications may be  different, depending upon the specific nature of the contract and other terms  and conditions attached to it. Therefore, the decision of the Hon&#8217;ble Supreme  Court in the Northern Operating Systems Private Limited (NOS) judgment should not be applied mechanically in all the cases.  Investigation in each case requires a careful consideration of its distinct  factual matrix, including the terms of contract between overseas company and  Indian entity, to determine taxability or its extent under GST and  applicability of the principles laid down by the Hon&#8217;ble Supreme Court&#8217;s  judgment in Northern Operating Systems Private Limited (NOS) case.<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">It has also been represented by the industry that in many cases involving  secondment, the field formations are mechanically invoking extended period of  limitation under section 74(1) of the CGST Act.<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">In this regard, section 74 (1) of CGST Act reads as follows:<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"><em>&#8220;(1) Where it appears to the  proper officer that any tax has not been paid or short paid or erroneously  refunded or where input tax credit has been wrongly availed or utilized by  reason of fraud, or any wilful-misstatement or suppression of facts to evade  tax,&#8221;<\/em><\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">From the perusal of wording of section 74(1) of CGST Act, it is  evident that section 74(1) can be invoked only in cases where there is a fraud  or wilful mis- statement or suppression of facts to evade tax on the part of  the said taxpayer. Section 74(1) cannot be invoked merely on account of  non-payment of GST, without specific element of fraud or wilful mis-statement  or suppression of facts to evade tax. Therefore, only in the cases where the  investigation indicates that there is material evidence of fraud or wilful  misstatement or suppression of fact to evade tax on the part of the taxpayer,  provisions of section 74(1) of CGST Act may be invoked for issuance of show  cause notice, and such evidence should also be made a part of the show cause  notice.<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">The above aspects may be kept in consideration while investigating  such cases and issuing show cause notices.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>2022\/06\/cbic-logo-new-1.jpg<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":7535,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.klickongstworld.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9611"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.klickongstworld.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.klickongstworld.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.klickongstworld.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.klickongstworld.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9611"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/www.klickongstworld.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9611\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":9617,"href":"https:\/\/www.klickongstworld.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9611\/revisions\/9617"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.klickongstworld.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/7535"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.klickongstworld.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9611"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.klickongstworld.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9611"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.klickongstworld.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9611"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}